In the middle of a legal dispute with India’s largest airline, IndiGo, Mahindra Electric Automobile Ltd. has decided to stop using the “6E” trademark for its next electric SUV, which was formerly known as the “BE 6e.” This comes after IndiGo sued Mahindra in the Delhi High Court, claiming that the airline’s trademark, which is essential to its brand identity, was violated by Mahindra’s use of the “6E” mark.
Mahindra’s Dedication
On December 9, 2024, Mahindra assured the Delhi High Court that it would cease using the “6E” branding until the case was settled. The business has said it will rename the SUV “BE 6,” indicating that it intends to disassociate itself from the incident while still contesting IndiGo’s allegations in court.
Mahindra’s early action demonstrates a cautious strategy as the carmaker prepares to defend its brand without interfering with its planned product launch date.
The Position of IndiGo
Since 2015, IndiGo has maintained that “6E” is an essential component of its brand, representing its flight codes and marketing campaigns. The airline argues that Mahindra’s use of a similar mark could lead to customer confusion and has registered the trademark across multiple classes. IndiGo also highlighted the goodwill and reputation it has accumulated over the years and voiced concerns about the degradation of its brand identity.
Legal experts point out that IndiGo’s assertions are based on the trademark protection concept, which attempts to preserve brand distinctiveness and avoid customer misunderstanding. The airline wants to prevent Mahindra from using any form of “6E” to maintain its well-known brand.
Focus on Trademark Issues
The issue reminds us of the difficulties in obtaining trademark protection under Indian law, especially when businesses from other industries assert rights to similar marks. Mahindra’s “6E” trademark was meant for an electric SUV, but IndiGo works in the aviation industry. However, IndiGo contends that when a trademark has substantial consumer connection and familiarity, it is not constrained by industry limitations.
As IndiGo sued Mahindra, this case highlights the challenges companies face when diversifying into new industries. It raises significant issues regarding the possibility of branding strategy overlap and the degree to which trademarks can be protected in unrelated businesses.
Next Steps in the Court Case
The Delhi High Court has set April 2025 as the additional session for both parties to argue their cases. While IndiGo will try to prove that the trademark is essential to its reputation and has to be preserved, Mahindra is anticipated to contest the exclusivity of the “6E” mark.
Significance for Indian Trademark Regulation
A significant precedent for trademark enforcement and protection may be established by this case throughout India’s many industries. In order to prevent conflicts, it emphasises how crucial it is for companies to consider their branding initiatives carefully. The decision may also affect future national trademark disputes by elucidating the legal standards for assessing brand dilution and consumer confusion.
This case is a crucial illustration of the necessity of precise laws and cautious branding in a market that is becoming more integrated as the legal proceedings develop. Industry participants are closely monitoring IndiGo and Mahindra, and they are curious to see how this legal dispute develops and how it may impact Indian trademark law.
Also Read: Environmental Law and Climate Change Litigation: How Courts Are Shaping Global Environmental Policy