The Supreme Court of India has taken up a significant legal challenge regarding the imposition of Goods & Services Tax (GST). It’s the petition challenging GST on joint development agreements. The petition is about transfer of development rights within joint development agreements between real estate developers and landowners.
The court’s decision to admit the petition has prompted notices to be issued to the Union government. The GST Council, and Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) have also received notices. It’s to respond to a special leave petition (SLP) filed by a property developer based in Telangana.
Background and Legal Argument
This legal battle stems from a case previously dismissed by the Telangana High Court in February. The developer was represented by Abhishek A Rastogi, founder of Rastogi Chambers.
He argued that the GST on development rights within joint development agreements constitutes double taxation. Rastogi contends that the supply of land itself is exempt from GST. This is why he felt that applying the tax to associated rights would be unjust.
The controversy arose following a 2019 GST notification that altered the point of taxation. It is said to include the transfer of development rights from landowners to real estate developers. The petitioner views this as tantamount to taxing land sales indirectly.
Impact on Real Estate Projects
The application of an 18% GST rate to development rights could have far-reaching consequences for real estate ventures nationwide. It could affect projects in major markets like Mumbai, Pune, Bengaluru, Hyderabad, and Kolkata.
This change may disrupt the economics of joint developments and redevelopment efforts, altering cost structures significantly. Developers have voiced concerns to the Ministry of Finance about the implications of GST on rehabilitation apartments.
These apartments are provided free of charge to existing occupants as part of redevelopment projects. These joint ventures are pivotal in markets grappling with rising land costs and limited available land in urban centres.
Final Words
The Supreme Court’s ruling on this matter could reshape strategies within the real estate sector. It could potentially render certain projects unfeasible if the GST levy on development rights remains in place. The decision will have implications for all stakeholders involved, including developers and landowners.
It could potentially lead to fundamental shifts in property development practices. The petition challenging GST on joint development agreements represents a critical juncture in the legal interpretation of GST. The SC’s examination of this issue underscores its significance within the broader context of tax law.
For more such latest news, stay tuned at Kshetry & Associates.